Rocket Man

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

Over the weekend, North Korea launched yet another short-range guided missile, upsetting neighboring nations, but especially her brothers and sisters to the South. South Koreans, these days, have been dealt a “difficult hand.” As the country steps closer to the brink of a conventional war, a recently launched “currency war” by the Japanese is causing the South Korean “export engine” to experience stress. With the Yen down nearly 20% (vs. the USD), the Japanese have created a significant price advantage for their products offered to the global marketplace, leaving other export-driven nations (e.g., South Korea) at a disadvantage.

 

Thinking of another “rocket launched,” how about Japanese stocks? For the year, the Nikkei is up +48% (in local terms), and about +25% for USD-based investors (accounting for losses in the exchange rate). Along with these outcomes, there are other, possibly undesired, results of the inflation-targeting “Abenomics,” policies (or experiment?) supported by Prime Minister, Shinzo Abe, to free Japan from decades of deflation. More recently, we warned that “… upon announcement of major stimulus (or money creation) by the Bank of Japan, the 10yr yield on JGBs (Japanese Government Bonds, or the equivalent to Treasuries) dropped to an all-time low (0.425%), only to almost double(!) a few hours later.” The problem, however, is that ever since, long-term yields have kept rising, and doubled again, to 0.89%. Not a big deal, one may think, as rates are still below 1%; but, for a nation that is already allocating about 50% of total public spending to debt service and social security, the trend is not pretty. Consider that Japanese Banks (in good recycling fashion) hold a majority of all outstanding JGBs, we can already spot another rocket in the distance – this one “nose down” … According to a recent IMF publication, a “[1 percent] rise in market yields would lead to mark-to-market (MTM) losses of 20 percent(!) of Tier-1 capital for regional banks (not taking into account net unrealized gains on securities).” More simply, small increases in interest rates can have a magnified negative impact on the required capital reserves of banks.

 

The “nose-down” scenario for banks in the U.S. was clearly averted by domestic Rocket Man, Ben Bernanke. His directed balance sheet expansion has eased funding stress and, on the “flip-side,” created quite the “launch” for U.S. stocks. The S&P 500 is now up 151% (price return) from the dismal levels of March 2009; this is a picture-perfect environment, also considering that U.S. bond yields have not moved “Japanese style,” still marked near historically-low levels at 1.94% (10yr). Here’s the catch: If our friends at mi2partners are correct, we may experience some sort of déjà vu of developments that took place in 2003. Back then, the world encountered a significant decline in global bond prices, preceeded by (read carefully) 1) the Japanese in dire need to bail-out their failed banking system, and 2) U.S. market participants having bet on QE, but caught by a far less accommodative FED … sound familiar?

 

If our preview is correct, the next “rocket to launch” will most likely be linked to yields in U.S. Government paper. As we cannot be sure if “it’s gonna be a long, long time” before this event occurs (if at all), you may want to check your exposure to long duration investments, and rethink your overall bond strategy.

 

P.S. The lyrics to the song “Rocket Man” were inspired by Bernie Taupin’s (Elton John’s writing buddy) sighting of either a shooting star or a distant airplane. The moral here: it doesn’t matter what actually triggered the launch of a great composition, a “hit is a hit.”

 

Big Themes – Outlook 360 Spring Edition

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

I. Introduction

 

Five years ago, we founded HighTower in the midst of the 2008/2009 financial crisis. This, in itself, was a courageous undertaking at that particular time, and we certainly (in retrospect) contributed to a Big Theme ourselves (knowingly or not). The transformation of the financial industry is in full motion, with an increasing number of independent financial services businesses being established throughout the marketplace and across our nation. In this competitive landscape, HighTower was recognized as one of the fastest-growing, privately-held companies in the U.S., recently ranked #13 (lucky number) on the prestigious Inc. 500 list. Today, we are one of the leaders in the evolution of the independent model for financial advice.

 

To refresh our collective memories, in case the 360 format does not “ring a bell”: Our partnership is not bound to follow any single viewpoint. As we do not have to sell product, but rather provide advice to our clients, our business model allows us to reduce or avoid many conflicts we may have faced earlier in our careers as financial advisors. More importantly, we enjoy insight into leading opinions from Wall Street and beyond. On this basis, we made the decision, some time ago, to discontinue publishing a standard market outlook in lieu of a more reflective approach  ̶  a “look around the industry,” or 360, as we named it.

 

In this 360 edition, we focus on themes that may not be relevant with respect to immediate financial market and related investment outcomes. Instead, we provide a selection of viewpoints from our respected HighTower Partners, with a focus on aspects that could lead paradigm shifts and may have an impact on investment allocation choices and outcomes in the long run. Whereas we recognize the importance of tactical and strategic allocation choices, it is monumental to also consider the “big picture,” specifically in an increasingly interconnected world, either to avoid risk or to seek an investment-relevant opportunity.

 

Topics covered include the challenge of feeding a growing world population, demographics and economic development, and the potential end of an independent Federal Reserve Bank.

 

Please follow this link for the full article:  2013 Q2 Big Themes

 

 

Hotel California

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

My colleagues consider my distinct (possibly questionable) assessment of good vs. bad hotels as “diva-ish” (some may even think I am an idiot). Possibly a full and extensive topic for another blog, I can assure you, that with nearly 20 years of combined personal and business travel experience, one begins to have a good sense of the “dark side” of accommodations hidden behind the shiny stars. This writing should have carried the title “Reality vs. Perception,” but in our attempt to not immediately reveal our planned course of writing, as well as to deliver on our traditional music reference, it turned out to be Hotel California, possibly the best-known song by the Eagles

 

In 1950, Robert Schuman (not the composer, but the French Foreign Minister) became the promoter of a united Europe by announcing plans of the formation of the European Coal and Steel Community, which became the Foundation for the European Union (and later the EMU). On the surface, Schuman had the objective to establish a common value system, but part of his hidden agenda was to create an environment for European countries to never again be at war with their neighbors. German Chancellor, Konrad Adenauer, recognized as the first statesmen to have reconciled the relationship between France and Germany after WWII, subsequently bought into Schuman’s plan. Voilà.

 

With much “civic love” and reconciliation having taken place over the years, Germany’s Banking system now carries about $2.62 trillion in exposure to debt of other Governments across the world (Q4 2012), including $996 billion to the Euro area. When segregating those numbers to the PIIGS (Portugal-Italy-Ireland-Greece-Spain), German Bank exposure totals a little less than $400 billion (BIS) of an estimated Euro 8.3 trillion ($11 trillion) banking system (assets) or nearly 11% of German GDP (ca. $3.6 trillion at 2012 figures). Not a small chunk. These numbers do not even account for all the “other stuff,” including regular lending activities among banks, derivatives, etc. I guess Adenauer didn’t see this one coming. 

 

Another lesson in perceived realities: On the “home front,” everyone appears to have gone “gaga” over the latest employment report and related unemployment rate of 7.5%(!). Admittedly, it is not too shabby compared to previous years, but underneath the surface the story is different. “In March, 7.6 million Americans who want more hours were stuck in part-time jobs, about the same as a year earlier and 3 million more than there were when the recession began at the end of 2007.” The job market is only improving on the “net line.” When considering more and more people leaving the labor force, along with an increasing number of “underemployed” workers, the real unemployment rate (U6) still stands at nearly 14%(!). More tragic is the development in youth unemployment across the globe, now being called “Generation Jobless”: “OECD figures suggest that 26m 15- to 24-year-olds in developed countries are not in employment, education or training; the number of young people without a job has risen by 30% since 2007 … Depending on how you measure them, the number of young people without a job is nearly as large as the population of America.” In Spain and Italy, respectively, youth unemployment ranges between 40 and 55%(!). The situation is unsustainable, but for now it’s a breeding ground for radical measures and political opinions. 

 

The lyrics to “Hotel California” describe a “luxury resort where ‘you can check out anytime you like, but you can never leave.’ On the surface, it tells the tale of a weary traveler who becomes trapped in a nightmarish luxury hotel that at first appears inviting and tempting” … but then things change (as always). The Germans may have created this very constellation for themselves. In other words, it’s quite an expensive undertaking to “leave” now – either you pay up and help your ailing neighbors, or you let them fail, likely implying that Mrs. Merkel and friends would have to “bail out” or possibly nationalize the German banking system. Regarding the young and unemployed across the globe (and especially in Southern Europe), they are “stuck” in a similar dichotomy; improving headlines assessed on an incomplete basis with an underfunded education system, and their respective economies in dire straits.

 

What does this all mean in terms of investing?:

 

1. Beware of the vibrant “headline” news; we are most likely being told “stories of convenience.”

2. Should a “story of convenience” prove to be inaccurate, beware of volatility in markets.

3. As economic conditions continue to be “sub-par,” accommodative policies will exist (QE).

4. With further increases in the monetary base globally, asset price inflation will continue.

5. It will be fundamental to distinguish “inflated assets” from those that rise on good valuations.

6. As long as Central Banks keep easing, equity markets will have a “floor” … and so should bonds!

7. Central Banks will “take turns”:  After the U.S., it is now Japan’s turn. Europe (likely) will be next.

8. No country can afford a strong currency (competitive devaluation). Identify future stores of value.

9. Don’t turn greedy and “chase” markets. Manage volatility. Understand risk-adjusted returns. 

 

As HighTower is all about our 360 concept (i.e., “a look around the industry”), please find, in addition, an excellent opinion piece on Europe by our friends at Lord Abbett, specifically by Milton Ezrati, their Senior Economist and Market Strategist.

 

Left Pocket, Right Pocket

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

Markets have “shrugged-off the Italian scare,” and were off to yet another promised land of stellar returns in global equities. To keep our minds flexible, let us not forget to look beneath the surface. A common “confidence vote,” as it relates to the credibility of a sovereign nation, is the outcome of regular bond auctions held (a standard refinancing mechanism). And, there, was a nice surprise that helped market participants to initiate the recent turn-around: Italy was able to comfortably place a maximum targeted 6.5 billion Euro of long term-debt obligations. Relieved?!

 

Bond auctions held in most European nations, especially in Italy and Spain, are heavily supported by their respective domestic banks. According to data released by the European Central Bank (ECB), Italian banks purchased a record amount of government debt in January 2013, about 18.5 billion Euro(!), and (if this data point was not disconcerting enough) Monday’s auction was mostly absorbed by two Italian banks. Same deal, a little to the West, in Spain. Let’s not forget that these are the same (Spanish) banks, which require a minimum of 60 billion Euro in new capital and keep posting major losses. For some perspective, Spanish banking giant, Bankia, just reported the worst results ever recorded by a Spanish corporation, a screaming 19 billion Euro loss. Bankia was “bailed-out” by the European Commission in December of 2012 and continues to be nationalized ever since.

 

To round things up, there is another big player in the mix:  the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank. The FED reports that most cash reserves held in the US banking system are “under the roof” of foreign banks operating in the U.S. In the month of January 2013, the FED injected a record of $237 billion into foreign banks, a number greater than the liquidity influx seen after the Lehman collapse in September 2008. Something going on here? Let’s broaden the picture:

 

The top five banks in the U.S. receive about $64 billion in government subsidies, an amount roughly equal to their annual profits. Stated differently, our banking system, at the top of the global “financial food chain,” with nearly $9 trillion in combined assets, would just about break even in the absence of “welfare considerations.” The profits those banks are reporting are essentially transfers from taxpayers to their shareholders. None other than FED Chairman Bernanke, in his testimony to the Senate Banking Committee earlier this week, stated that American banks receive implicit subsidies because the market believes they are too big to fail. OK, case closed!

 

The above is exactly the reason why we prefer to talk “crazy” at times. “Drop It Low” was just the perfect outlet …

 

Behind the Numbers (Music): 2013 Edition

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

All in all, 2012 was not a shabby year for stock market investors or the economy … but then there is the constant (human) quest of explaining the somewhat unexplainable. What really happened here? For once, global Central Banks were united in their efforts to “flood” the world with extra liquidity and help to provide the volatility-controlling “back stop” (originally called the “Greenspan Put”) whenever it became dicey. In fact, an estimated $18 trillion of central bank “dough” (nearly 1/3 of world GDP at 2011 figures!) was committed over the past decade, and about $1 trillion is “earmarked” by the FED alone for 2013. Conclusion = asset price inflation. 

 

Next, we have the U.S. consumer, who is responsible for about 70% of economic growth (on our “home turf”). According to a November 2012 update, consumer spending had increased to a 3-year high! If we combine this fact with a significant reduction in the personal savings rate, a steady increase in consumer credit, and countless transfer payments, Americans have never been so reliant on the almighty Government. And we must scratch our heads, for where will the money come from in 2013? Conclusion = not sure right now.

 

Spending by the public and private sectors is a game of confidence. We can expand credit in the hope that things will get better, and that obligations can be repaid with future dollars. Sure enough, this morning, markets are “taking off” on the promise of the presented (in)decision around the “Fiscal Cliff.” In short: Agreements without any meaningful consideration of spending limitations and, related, the U.S. Debt Ceiling. Not to be overly cynical, but one may wonder why our policymakers have spent all their precious time away from their families over the Holidays to come up with this half–… solution!(?) It is not that the importance of the issue came as a surprise.

 

We recall financial markets in crisis over the Summer of 2011, as a result of Standard&Poors’ downgrade of the U.S. Long-term Credit rating (for the first time in history). A detail worth mentioning is that the downgrade was also linked to the indecision of policymakers at that time. What have we really learned? With greater uncertainty avoided as it relates to the “home economies” of U.S. families, the bigger picture still remains to be resolved. Likely conclusions = 1) another U.S. downgrade in the making; 2) a weaker Dollar (for all the wrong reasons); 3) volatility in financial markets (after the initial “Hip Hip Hooray” fizzles); 4) more asset price inflation to come, with the FED “all over it.” 

 

On a lighter note, and true to our promise to bring music to your lives, please enjoy the “DJ Earworm Mashup – United State of Pop 2012 (Shine Brighter)”. Very cool!

 

Good Investing and a Healthy New Year!

 

Economy Watch – Radio Interview with Matthias Kuhlmey

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

Our “blog” today is a recent appearance on the “Economy Watch” segment of Chuck Jaffe’s Moneylife radio show, released this morning, as well as a reference in Chuck Jaffe’s Marketwatch article, published yesterday.

 

Please follow the above hyperlinks for the referenced interview and article.

 

Missing Words … and Numbers

Posted By:  Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

The German magazine, Der Spiegel, is running a very interesting cover story this week, entitled “Heimat.” When I tried to explain to my wife what the article is all about, I l realized that there is no English word to translate Heimat. After doing some research, we acknowledge that Heimat “is a German word that has no simple English translation, denoting the relationship of a human being towards a certain spatial social unit. The term forms a contrast to social alienation and usually carries positive connotations. It is often expressed with terms such as home or homeland, but these English counterparts fail to encapsulate the true meaning of the word.”

 

With further lack of words, let us attempt to explain the current market or market participants’ behavior — as good as we can (promise). Setting the scene: We have terrible job numbers in the U.S. — meaning terrible(!) — about 50% under expectations, as reported last Friday (known as a “miss” in financial jargon); there is a continuously deteriorating situation in Europe, with our beloved European Central Bank (ECB)  preparing to buy European Sovereign Debt to ease markets; and, last but not least, we have seen a modest increase in Unemployment Claims, here at home. The Conclusion:  It does not matter! The “Solution”:  As soon as bad news “hit the tape,” the Talking Heads of the FED, ECB et al (Central Banks Unite) are not shy of words, even though they should choose them carefully. The “quick fix” is generously promised, and a bit of “hinting here and there” gives investors the confidence needed.

 

Wait a minute, what is an investor, anyway? You would think a thoughtful person, studying balance sheets, and being in for the long run — but not so fast. Doing some research on this word, even speculators may as well be considered investors. And here is the dilemma: Central Banks, ever since the Credit Crisis of 2008/2009, have been facilitating the most significant liquidity injection ever experienced by modern society. The Bank of Japan (BoJ) and ECB have expanded their balance sheets to about 25% of respective GDPs, while the FED and Bank of England come in at around 20%. On this basis, we are not talking investing, but rather of a massive inflation trade in the making.

 

Without a more formal approach to investing (and now we are referring to the “real thing”), there will be disappointment over the outcome, sooner than later. However, if you think all is “dandy,” consider another great data point, as observed by Bloomberg:  Apple stock’s price performance has accounted for 8% (!) of the Standard and Poor’s increase from March 2009 to this week. Fortunately, we do have an English word to describe our reaction to this — “Speechless!”

 

Weekend Thoughts

Posted By: Matthias Paul Kuhlmey

 

It is surprising to us that hardly anyone (openly) worries about the price of Oil. Sure, we hear a few voices here and there, but are made to believe that the consumer is now more resilient to the recent rise of Oil (highest since June 2008), since prospects in the job market appear to be better; this link, in our view, is not entirely logical in nature, but it is certainly a driver of confidence – and that may be it. According to BMO Capital Markets, “Gasoline accounts for about 4 percent of personal consumption in the U.S. and the price of gasoline is estimated to exceed the $5 per-gallon level, given the consistent increase in oil prices since September 2011.” It is interesting to note, however, that President Obama recently attempted to blame “burgeoning growth” in India, China, and Brazil for rising Oil prices, but without mention of the fact that significantly-increased global liquidity (provided by mainly Developed World Central Bankers) have elevated speculation, especially in Commodities, over the years. One more note: Experts warn that if the conflict around Iran were to escalate, Oil could easily trade above $150/barrel – and there is no question that, under this scenario, the outlook for the global economy and stock markets would change.

 

We are still worrying about Greece, and, in the meantime, one of the largest European economies is simply “hitting the wall”. As we learn today, Spain’s unemployment rate has reached a staggering 22.9%, the highest among the 17 Eurozone members. Further, the Spanish economy produced negative growth in the last quarter of 2011 and is now expected to enter into recession. The unemployment situation is even worse, when considering Youth Unemployment: In Spain, about 50% of the “around 20″ age-group is out of a job. The regional government of Valencia, one of the most indebted in the Spanish nation (recently downgraded to “junk status”), has applied austerity measures to cut electricity, water, and public funding for Schools. Violent protests among students are now common. If one may think this is a phenomenon specific to Spain, we must correct that notion. Youth Unemployment is an issue across all European Nations, with numbers in excess of 20% even for the U.K. and France … not a good basis on which to build a functioning society.

 

Now let’s “pull together” Oil and Employment (or the prospect of it). Two things that debt-burdened-economies undoubtedly require are growth and the related improvement of the employment situation. We know that Oil price-spikes preceded the 1973, 1980, 1991, 2001 and 2007 recessions, but did not cause a recession in 2011; this is an easy one to distinguish – Mr. Bernanke took care of the issue by providing liquidity to the system. From a different perspective, we just have to realize that change is necessary as we are caught in a “Catch 22”: Stimulus to the system creates speculative money; speculative money goes where real value is perceived or speculation is effective (Commodities, as a good example); rising commodity prices (Oil and Agriculture) burden the consumer. A fascinating paper on the topic of Oil-led Development concludes that, “More than any other group of countries, oil-dependent countries demonstrate perverse linkages between economic performance, poverty, bad governance, injustice and conflict.”

 

Is this another attempt to leave our readers on a negative note? No, quite the opposite – it is an opportunity to reflect on what we individually can do to foster change …